[Oral drugs containing alcohol: Should we be careful?] / Médicaments par voie orale contenant de l'alcool : faut-il être vigilant ?

Ethanol is an excipient with known effect whose presence is regulated because it can cause adverse effects, notably a misuse. In order to raise awareness of this risk, this study searched all oral drugs with ethanol as an excipient from the Theriaque® database. All drugs marketed in France with a unit dose ethanol intake of 0.1g or more were identified and analyzed, according to the maximum unit and daily dosage recommended by the manufacturer. This research revealed 106 pharmaceutical specialties responsible for a unit intake of ethanol of 0.1g or more among the 8532 oral drugs containing ethanol (1.2 %): 2 at a daily dose >13g and the majority (57/106; 54 %) at a daily dose <1g. These are mainly oral solutions (97/106; 91 %) of phytotherapy (45/97; 46 %). The most frequently found therapeutic class was antitussive (12/106; 11 %). The majority of drugs are over-the-counter medication (56/106; 53 %). Overall, 106 drugs on the French market can be associated with a risk of misuse and cause adverse effects in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant women. Vigilance and appropriate monitoring is required for these drugs (especially those over-the-counter ones), and their substitution should be preferred if possible.

Does DDI-Predictor Help Pharmacists to Detect Drug-Drug Interactions and Resolve Medication Issues More Effectively?

The characterization of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may require the use of several different tools, such as the thesaurus issued by our national health agency (i.e., ANSM), the metabolic pathways table from the Geneva University Hospital (GUH), and DDI-Predictor (DDI-P). We sought to (i) compare the three tools' respective abilities to detect DDIs in routine clinical practice and (ii) measure the pharmacist intervention rate (PIR) and physician acceptance rate (PAR) associated with the use of DDI-P. The three tools' respective DDI detection rates (in %) were measured. The PIRs and PARs were compared by using the area under the curve ratio given by DDI-P (RAUC) and applying a chi-squared test. The DDI detection rates differed significantly: 40.0%, 76.5%, and 85.2% for ANSM (The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products), GUH and DDI-P, respectively (p < 0.0001). The PIR differed significantly according to the DDI-P's RAUC: 90.0%, 44.2% and 75.0% for RAUC ≤ 0.5; RAUC 0.5-2 and RAUC > 2, respectively (p < 0.001). The overall PAR was 85.1% and did not appear to depend on the RAUC category (p = 0.729). Our results showed that more pharmacist interventions were issued when details of the strength of the DDI were available. The three tools can be used in a complementary manner, with a view to refining medication adjustments.

Effect of intravenous hydration in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancers are at high risk for bone metastases, which accelerate bone resorption and skeletal complications. Therefore, bisphosphonates, which are strong inhibitors of bone resorption, are widely used to prevent pathological fractures, pain and tumour-induced hypercalcaemia. Intravenous infusion of bisphosphonate is associated with dose- and infusion rate-dependent adverse renal effects. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the effect of hydration on bisphosphonate efficacy and safety. SETTINGS: The 600-bed CHOV Hospital (Neufchâteau, France) and the Université de Lorraine (Nancy, France). METHODS: Patients who received pamidronate or zoledronic acid treatments were identified: 50 patients [16 of whom were hydrated and 34 of whom were non-hydrated]. Data on serum calcium levels, creatinine clearance and clinical tolerance were collected. Main outcome measure The impact of hydration on these parameters was analysed between day 1 and day 7. RESULTS: Bisphosphonate normalized calcaemia and hydration did not induce further reduction of calcium levels. Patient kidneys were significantly preserved by hydration in both groups (median clearance: +6.2%), whereas dehydrated patients had lower creatinine clearance (median clearance: -1.1%). Hydration did not influence other clinical or biological parameters tested. CONCLUSION: Hydration plays an important role in the treatment of hypercalcaemia by pamidronate and zoledronic acid: it enhances kidney protection (i.e., creatinine clearance).